Russia: Positions of Brewing CompaniesThe review contains an analysis of interim performance of brewers in the first half of 2019. There are rather dynamic changes behind a modest industry growth. Baltika is again experiencing a stage of volumes and market share slid due to competition with AB InBev Efes. Because of the price competition and presence expansion in the modern trade company #2. has come close to the leading position. At the same time sales of Heineken Russia have continued growing which makes the premium part of the portfolio heavier. The market premiumization trend had been also confirmed by import brands. MBC and Zavod Trekhsosenskiy have been the most successful among federal market players. The market share of independent regional brewers and Ochakovo have continued falling as they are being squeezed out by the market leaders at their competitive fields.
Ukrainian beer market 2019: companies and brandsIn 2019 beer production and market have been still fluctuating about zero point. However, the past season was successful for brewers judging by the sales profitability. The price mix has improved due to rapid general market premiumization, as well as its particular aspect, the growth of import beer sales. By the season end AB InBev Efes improved its positions considerably. It turned out that consumers had not forgot Efes brands that had to leave the market, but started to recover rapidly. Against the stagnating market that meant sales decline of other companies, in the first place Carlsberg Group that most of all beneficiated from Efes exiting the market. PPB turned out to be stable to branding activity of its competitor and Obolon kept the same volumes and at the moment it is the absolute leader of the economy segment. The share growth of independent producers took place thanks to leading craft breweries, that so far do not have a big market weight, but they are rapidly gaining it.
Brewing industry in Kazakhstan 2019During the first half of 2019, the majority of Kazakh brewers made their contribution into positive dynamics. Yet it was companies of the lower division, not the two transnational leaders that raised their production and sales. The shares of draft beer and aluminum can which is rapidly squeezing glass bottle out of the market, have been growing. The price segmentation has remained stable despite the substantial rise of retail prices and fluctuations of brand market shares, while the borders between segments have become blurred. The main events in the industry have been: the announced revision of the beer excise policy, launch of BeerKhan brand in the strong beer segment, and most important – purchasing assets of Shymkentbeer by Arasan.
The trend of complication of Russian beer market is going on and in several directions at the same time. The range has got wider, the import and small segments are growing, namely craft beer, alcohol-free beer and special flavor beer. At the same time, all ex-mega brands and light lagers by Russian brewers are experiencing a decline of their shares. AB InBev Efes, Heineken, MBC and Pivzavod Trekhsosenskiy have exceeded the market, Carlsberg was developing slower than the market and Ochakovo as well as some other mid-sized breweries have been cutting down their volumes. To a big extent brewers’ performance was connected to their ability to reach agreement with networks, sacrifice their margin and enter new markets. Craft brewers are facing a serious danger of producers’ registration introduction – de facto licensing. ...
The global outlooks of the legal market of cannabis are excellent. It is possible to simultaneously imagine dry law repeal and craft brewing boom but not in one but in several consumer categories. For alcohol is contained in liquids and cannabis derivatives can be in three physical forms.The value of legal market of cannabis and its products can reach 10% of the world beer market in five years, and in 2030-2040 even reach the same scope provided the current rates of legalization and development of market infrastructure remain at the same level. Cannabinoids are actively integrating into the food industry from chewing gum to beverages deforming the pharmaceutical and alcohol markets, they influence the trends of healthy lifestyle and beauty. ...
Heineken accused of ‘raw deal’ for S&N pensioners
The S&N Pensions Group (SNPG) is lobbying the Commons' business, innovation and skills select committee to investigate allegations that Heineken has failed to fulfil undertakings given on the pension scheme before the takeover of the Edinburgh brewer in 2008.
Tom Ward - former S&N corporate development and strategy director and now the spokesman for the campaign - claimed existing S&N pensioners, former employees with deferred pensions and current members of the renamed Heineken UK had "been given a raw deal and treated unfairly and dishonourably".
He added: "Before the takeover, we understood that Heineken NV, the parent company, stood firmly behind its public and private commitments on pensions.
"To now make a U-turn on its very public undertaking to follow S&N's 40 years or so of company practice in applying inflationary increases to pensions is deeply offensive."
SNPG said that, at a shareholder EGM in March 2008 to approve the joint ?7.8 billion takeover by Heineken and Carlsberg of Denmark, it was explicitly stated "there is a practice of providing discretionary pension increases each year… it is Heineken's intention to continue this practice".
SNPG said the commitment was also made to the Court of Session the following month, which passed the scheme of arrangement for the takeover to go ahead. The commitment to inflation-linked pension increases relates to S&N pensions built up in the scheme before April 1997, before which such increases were not mandatory.
SNPG said Heineken paid an inflation-linked pension increase in 2008, there was "understandably" no inflation linked rise in 2009 when inflation was virtually zero, but that the Dutch brewer paid nothing for 2010 when inflation was running at more than 4 per cent.
SNPG maintained that, although the word "discretionary" was used formally in the takeover relating to such payments, S&N's Dutch owner has acted "in bad faith" given that it was well aware the Scottish management had a "near-perfect record" of making such payments going back to the 1970s.
Ward said: "Heineken knew exactly what S&N's management meant in our discussions on pensions (before the takeover]. It was very well-established practice, if not legally guaranteed.
"We were not playing with words. We are talking, in many cases, of people who are 70 and 75 years old, perhaps on pensions of ?6,000 and ?7,000 a year, for whom a retail prices index-linked pension means a lot."
7 Июн. 2011