Beer market of Russia 2018
- General market picture
- Foreign trade setting records
- Demography as challenge to branding
- Aged consumer
- Declining of youth brands
- Nostalgia on trend
- DIOT feels at home
- 5.0 Original is the new face of import
- Positions of Market Leaders
- Carlsberg Group
- AB InBev Efes
- AB InBev
Ukrainian beer market 2018
- Better than yesterday
- Performance by value
- Positions of Ukrainian brewers
The beer market dynamics in Russia is approaching zero, yet major brewers are divided into those who developed considerably in 2017 and those who considerably reduced their volumes. For instance, company Efes has managed to substantially extend their sales due to restrained pricing policy and activity in the modern trade. Heineken has also demonstrated an excellent performance promoted by significant increase of advertisement budgets launching a non-alcohol sort of the title brand and unusual activity in the economy market segment. Carlsberg and AB InBev have been focusing on margins and lost a market share of their inexpensive brands. Serious dependence on PET package and mass enthusiasm about Zhigulevskoe have negatively impacted the most of big regional brewers, that have been for the first time pressed by the leaders in the key sales channels, especially in Volga and Central regions. In the small business there has been a noticeable slowdown in appearing of new restaurant breweries, yet the number of craft breweries has been growing rapidly. In 2018, the beer market is likely to grow a little, while the share of AB InBev Efes may decrease due to the integration. ...
“Catalogue of Russian Beer Producers 2018” includes 1070 businesses ranging from large subsidiaries of international companies to rather small restaurant and craft microbreweries.The catalogue includes 32 large breweries, 75 regional breweries, 693 industrial mini- and microbreweries as well as 270 restaurant breweries. ...
Heineken’s takeover of S&N to be probed
The Business, Innovation and Skills Select Committee will look at evidence that there was not enough protection for thousands of S&N pensioners after the takeover by the Dutch lager maker in 2008. The evidence session is expected to take place in the autumn, and it will examine details of the takeover and in particular why Heineken did not pay any discretionary increases in pensions in 2010.
The S&N Pension Group, which was set up to challenge the company’s decision, wrote to the chairman of the BIS select committee in early June requesting a review.
The group claimed that a public undertaking had been given by Heineken during the final stages of the S&N takeover that it was the intention of the Dutch business to continue S&N’s long standing practice of providing discretionary rises on pensions in line with inflation.
But Heineken now says that it never intended to continue the practice and froze pensions where they had a discretion to do so.
Tom Ward, former corporate director of Scottish and Newcastle, said: “We are delighted that the Parliamentary Select Committee is going to hold a wide ranging inquiry. This is a good result as it will allow all the issues to be looked at in detail and with public scrutiny.”
Mr Ward, who is also a spokesman for the pressure group, said: “Before the takeover, we understood that Heineken NV, the parent company stood firmly behind their public and private commitments on pensions. To make a U-turn on this very public undertaking is deeply offensive”.
The pensioners are continuing with their campaign and have been in talks with relevant politicians and the trade union Unite. Charlie McKenna, 73, from Newcastle, was a tanker driver with S&N until he retired in 1999.
He said: “I am very pleased someone is going to look into this now.”
It has also now emerged that many hundreds of pensioners have made individual complaints to the Pension Ombudsman. The UK Take Over Panel has also been contacted to offer background help.
In a statement Heineken said: “The discretionary decision we took last year was based on the outlook for our fund at that time and we will be reviewing it again later this year. Of course we understand the strength of feeling among those who did not receive pension increases.”
The company said it was happy to continue dialogue and justify action to any relevant body who wished to review the matter.
12 Июл. 2011