Where is the non-alcoholic beer market heading to? Companies and brands. Baltika as a democratic leader. Heineken – how do you shake up the market and shove up the competitors. AB InBev Efes – premium corner. Non-alcoholic import beer. Non-alcoholic beer - Who drinks it? General conclusions. Summer beer. ...
“Catalogue of Russian Beer Producers 2020” includes 1285 businesses ranging from large subsidiaries of international companies to rather small restaurant and craft breweries.This issue has 171 more breweries compared to 2018 (155 business have been excluded and 326 have been included).Starting from 2019, FTS has been publishing data on excise payments by brewers (delayed by 1.5 years), that can be translated into beer equivalent for most of producers.Depending on the volumes, we ranked the brewers that provided information by 6 groups (see pic.). At one end of the production spectrum there are 2/3 of breweries outputting less than 10 thousand decaliters. Their net share amounts to as little as 0.2% of the total beer output volume. On the other end there are 6 federal groups accounting for almost 80%. ...
Dmitry Nekrasov’s Philosophy — on the Past, Present and Future of Ukrainian Brewing IndustryA meeting with Dmitry Nekrasov always turns into a training course: “Introduction to brewing business“. We are talking to a clever “playing trainer“ a person that can be called a godfather of the Ukrainian craft. He has a dozen of successful projects to his name. Dmitry told us about craft beer in Ukraine, on market cycles, on specifity of operating in retail and HoReCa, on union of Ukrainian brewers and certainly, how a brewery of his own, First Dnipro Brewery is doing.
The market of import beer in Russia: review and databasesThe market of import beer is rapidly growing and changing. But while in the past years it was growing due to brands variety, in 2019 major and affordable brands from TOP-10 were developing actively. It seems that the fact of a brand origin from far abroad counties, even if it is not well known but has moderate price and good distribution provides for million liters of sales in the territory of Russia. Among distributors AB InBev Efes was far behind, yet the role of Baltika and suppliers of the second row got more important. The boom of German brands was followed by stagnation of import from other traditional regions (and Belarus) instead the supplies from Mexico, Lithuania and Asian countries grew considerably.
Weak Foster’s results give SABMiller’s offer a chance
An appreciation of the Australian dollar against sterling would mean that SABMiller was not only unlikely to enhance its A$4.90 (R36.76) a share offer but would use the A$500 million “cash return”, proposed by Foster’s chief executive John Pollaers, as an excuse to walk away from the deal.
Following last week’s release by Foster’s of a pedestrian set of results for the year to June, analysts and commentators appear to believe that SABMiller, the second-largest beer group in the world, is likely to succeed in its bid for control of the high-margin and cash-rich Australian beer group.
A number of analysts remarked that not only were the results on the weaker side of expectations but that Pollaers’ proposals for turning around the group were unconvincing. So unpersuasive were Pollaers’ revival plans that one analyst presumed he was already setting the scene for a compromise arrangement with SABMiller.
“Pollaers is an extremely ambitious individual and very competent, given what he did for Diageo in south Asia; if he could be convinced that there is a role for him at the second largest beer group in the world he might be persuaded to talk the board and shareholders into supporting the SABMiller offer”, remarked an individual who has worked with Pollaers.
However, analysts pointed out that such persuasion would have to include some sort of sweetener on the A$4.90 a share offer price.
The long list of conditions that SABMiller attached to the conditional offer it announced 10 days ago included that the offer would be reduced by the amount of any dividend paid and that any dividend payment would be limited to 15 Australian cents a share. Last week when Foster’s released its results, it announced a dividend of 13.25c a share.
Analysts believe SABMiller could lift its offer to just over A$5 a share, and allow the dividend, for a revived offer of an effective A$5.15 a share. This would represent a more appropriate premium for control of what Barclays Capital described as one of the few remaining sizeable and independent beer businesses in the world.
Significantly, after some volatility in the wake of the results announcement, the Foster’s share price appears to have settled at just over A$5.
Foster’s disappointing results, its pedestrian revival programme and the uncertainty surrounding global markets works to SABMiller’s advantage. In addition, the absence of any competing offer from one of the other major beer groups enhances the attractiveness of the SABMiller bid.
However, as the UK’s Financial Times noted last week in response to the results, while there has been no sign of another beer company making a bid, Foster’s is an extremely attractive cash-generating operation, which makes it an attractive private equity proposal. But the drivers of a private equity deal would have to be confident that they have access to the sort of management skills that can generate the improved performance that SABMiller is confident it can achieve.
In the absence of any competing offer in the coming weeks it seems likely that SABMiller will secure one of the last few remaining independents in this rapidly consolidating industry.
29 Авг. 2011