The trend of complication of Russian beer market is going on and in several directions at the same time. The range has got wider, the import and small segments are growing, namely craft beer, alcohol-free beer and special flavor beer. At the same time, all ex-mega brands and light lagers by Russian brewers are experiencing a decline of their shares. AB InBev Efes, Heineken, MBC and Pivzavod Trekhsosenskiy have exceeded the market, Carlsberg was developing slower than the market and Ochakovo as well as some other mid-sized breweries have been cutting down their volumes. To a big extent brewers’ performance was connected to their ability to reach agreement with networks, sacrifice their margin and enter new markets. Craft brewers are facing a serious danger of producers’ registration introduction – de facto licensing. ...
The global outlooks of the legal market of cannabis are excellent. It is possible to simultaneously imagine dry law repeal and craft brewing boom but not in one but in several consumer categories. For alcohol is contained in liquids and cannabis derivatives can be in three physical forms. The value of legal market of cannabis and its products can reach 10% of the world beer market in five years, and in 2030-2040 even reach the same scope provided the current rates of legalization and development of market infrastructure remain at the same level. Cannabinoids are actively integrating into the food industry from chewing gum to beverages deforming the pharmaceutical and alcohol markets, they influence the trends of healthy lifestyle and beauty. ...
Beer market of Kazakhstan acquired both traits of East European countries and South Eastern Asia taking a transitional position between them by many criteria and consumption style. Yet there is a positive trend in beer production which differs Kazakhstan from most of the neighboring countries. The market has remained consolidated in the hands of two international players because of its small size. However, it faces dynamic processes such as fast growth of draft beer sales, up and downs of regional companies and Carlsberg Group’s ultimate expansion. Excessive mainstream segment has declined over the recent years, yet, Zhigulevskoe and national brands with regional links have yielded their positions to a range of new products. In our review special attention was paid to regional analysis of the markets. In 14 regions of Kazakhstan we compared the companies’ positions, the market price segmentation and DIOT channel development. Besides we have compared the beer market of Kazakhstan to neighboring countries. ...
Hurdles loom for alcohol prohibition bill in Indonesia
Indonesia's House of Representatives is likely to miss the deadline for wrapping up its deliberation of the alcohol prohibition bill this year as lawmakers are caught up in fierce discussion on the scope of the proposed regulation and its potential impact on businesses and the general public.
After a two-week break, lawmakers are back in Jakarta this week to start their third sitting period for the year, during which they will continue deliberating dozens of priority bills from the 2016 National Legislation Program (Prolegnas), including the controversial alcohol prohibition bill.
The bill, sponsored by Islamist-oriented parties the United Development Party (PPP) and the Prosperous Justice Party (PKS), has returned to the table after all 10 party factions agreed last year to continue its deliberation.
The bill, reminiscent of US prohibition efforts in the 1920s, would outlaw the production, distribution and sale of beverages of more than 1 per cent alcohol content.
The bill has sparked widespread debate, including protests from alcoholic beverage producers, tourist industry players and local community leaders, who argue that the prohibition would drive tourists away and debase local traditions.
Despite being the world’s largest Muslim-majority country, Indonesia has a number of local traditions and rituals that involve the consumption of alcohol, including some in East Nusa Tenggara and on the resort island of Bali.
PPP lawmaker Mohammad Arwani Thomafi, who leads the House’s special committee for deliberating the bill, said lawmakers were still divided over the substance of the bill.
“There are parties that highlight the importance of a prohibition [and] there are parties that say alcohol consumption should be allowed with some exceptions, for example, students, or within school [grounds],” he said on Monday.
The fierce debate on the scope of the proposed prohibition is likely to end up at some sort of compromise, Arwani said.
“It is likely that the bill will allow the production of [alcoholic beverages] with very detailed limitations,” he said.
Earlier this week, publicly listed beer manufacturer PT Delta Djakarta, local producer of big beer brands including Anker, Carlsberg and San Miguel, expressed anxiety over the anticipated approval of the bill, saying that the move was likely to hamper its sales as it comes off a slow recovery after a rough 2015.
PT Multi Bintang Indonesia, the country's largest brewery and maker of the world-renowned Bintang Beer, has put a break on expansion plans because of uncertainty created by the bill.
Before being taken to a plenary meeting to receive final approval and get passed into law, a bill must be scrutinised by lawmakers in House’s commissions or in a special committee set up to deliberate it.
Nationalist parties, like the ruling Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P), the Golkar Party and the Gerindra Party, have not shown any particular resistance to the alcohol prohibition bill.
Speaking to The Jakarta Post on Wednesday (May 18), Gerindra lawmaker Aryo Djojohadikusumo, a member of the special committee for this bill, admitted that the discussion was a “tough” one.
The committee, for example, is still debating whether to drop the name of the bill and change it to “the alcohol control and supervision bill”.
“The word ‘prohibition’ is not in accordance with our Constitution,” he said, arguing that if the current bill were passed into law it would be annulled by the Constitutional Court.
19 мая. 2016