The beer market dynamics in Russia is approaching zero, yet major brewers are divided into those who developed considerably in 2017 and those who considerably reduced their volumes. For instance, company Efes has managed to substantially extend their sales due to restrained pricing policy and activity in the modern trade. Heineken has also demonstrated an excellent performance promoted by significant increase of advertisement budgets launching a non-alcohol sort of the title brand and unusual activity in the economy market segment. Carlsberg and AB InBev have been focusing on margins and lost a market share of their inexpensive brands. Serious dependence on PET package and mass enthusiasm about Zhigulevskoe have negatively impacted the most of big regional brewers, that have been for the first time pressed by the leaders in the key sales channels, especially in Volga and Central regions. In the small business there has been a noticeable slowdown in appearing of new restaurant breweries, yet the number of craft breweries has been growing rapidly. In 2018, the beer market is likely to grow a little, while the share of AB InBev Efes may decrease due to the integration. ...
“Catalogue of Russian Beer Producers 2018” includes 1070 businesses ranging from large subsidiaries of international companies to rather small restaurant and craft microbreweries.The catalogue includes 32 large breweries, 75 regional breweries, 693 industrial mini- and microbreweries as well as 270 restaurant breweries. ...
Global hop marketA local alternative to mass beer suggested by independent brewers has been successful and is now altering the global market. Beer is becoming more diversified, so transnational companies have to accept the new game rules and to switch focus to young and fast growing markets. All these processes increased the demand for aroma and bitter hop as well as their acreage expansion on two continents. However now there appeared a downward trend of alcohol consumption in the world, so even special sorts can soon turn to be sufficient. In this connection the dynamic American hop market is already facing some problems. EU hop producers have become more cautious, they are not racing to exceed the demand and look forward with more confidence, judging by the contract terms.
Hop Market in RussiaGermany still dominates the Russian market, yet over the recent two years one has been able observe a continuous success of Czech hop suppliers. Their expansion and growing popularity of hops from the United States became the drivers of supplies growth in 2016 despite the preceding modest harvest crop in the EU, as well as the factor of relative stability in 2017. In this connection, in 2017, the ratio of the varieties continued to shift towards the aroma ones, and the supplies of Magnum hop and other alpha varieties were reduced. However, the import of bitter hop pellets is partially replaced by extracts, especially from the major beer manufacturers. Total volumes of alpha acid supplies, according to our estimation, decreased by approximately 5% and returned to the level of 2015. Barth Haas Group continues dominating the hop products market; HVG also increased its weight. At the same time, Morris Hanbury significantly reduced the supplies in 2017.
Ireland. Drinks Industry says National Alcohol Report is a missed opportunity to address misuse
· Lack of evidence to support key recommendations in the report
· Sponsorship ban will present major challenge for sporting and cultural organisations
The Alcohol Beverage Federation of Ireland (ABFI)* has said that, while agreeing with and welcoming the majority of the recommendations contained in today’s National Substance Misuse Strategy Group publication, the report as a whole is a missed opportunity to address the very serious issue of alcohol misuse.
ABFI said that given that alcohol consumption has fallen 17% in the last decade and that this downward trend is likely to continue, an opportunity existed to introduce targeted measures aimed at those who misuse alcohol products as well as addressing binge and underage drinking.
Instead, however, today’s report includes a number of unnecessary and unworkable proposals that if implemented will hit the average consumer who enjoys alcohol responsibly, will impact on the 62,000 jobs and €2 billion in tax revenue that the drinks industry supports across the economy, and will do little or nothing to address alcohol misuse.
Key recommendations such as a ban on drinks industry sponsorship of sporting and cultural events would be extremely challenging for national and local sporting organisations. It will leave them starved of revenue for both major international fixtures and for grassroots teams and clubs, while there would also be a serious decline in major cultural events, festivals, and concerts. The reality is that there are already strict co-regulatory codes applying to how alcohol brands can market, promote and support these events.
ABFI added that the report was legally misguided in its pursuit of minimum pricing, and that the re-introduction of the ban on below cost selling would be a far more effective means of addressing the sale of cheap alcohol. ABFI also said the view of the industry had been effectively supressed by not including a minority report submitted by the Federation, alongside today’s final report.
The Director of ABFI, Kathryn D’Arcy, commented, “Ireland already has one of the highest alcohol excise and taxation regimes in Europe and our industry operates within the most regulated environment for alcohol marketing anywhere in the world. Given that we are drinking far less than we did 10 years ago we do not need further restrictions, bans and legislation in order to address misuse.
“It is the culture of binge and underage drinking that needs to be addressed, not the entirely legitimate activities of a major industry, whose products are among Ireland’s leading brands and which supports jobs, businesses and livelihoods the length and breadth of the country.
“ABFI played a full role in the National Substance Misuse Steering Group and continually called for evidence based measures to support the Group’s recommendations. While there is much to be welcomed in the report, regrettably in some key areas the failure to provide all available evidence to support the calls for restrictions, levies and bans means that we oppose a number of key recommendations.
“The fact that a decision was taken to disregard our objections as expressed in our minority report by not including it in today’s publication undermines the final report as a true reflection of what was expressed at the Group.
“Many of the key measures in this report, if taken on board, will simply penalise the average consumer who enjoys alcohol sensibly and responsibly. We will continue to bring this view to Government to ensure they take this on board when forming national alcohol policy.”
14 Feb. 2012